This discussion explores recent criticisms of the newest Call of Duty entry and its incorporation of artwork produced by artificial intelligence. The game has drawn attention as fans quickly pointed out visual inconsistencies shortly after launch.
Players have been sharing images that reveal unusual graphic details. They note oddities such as figures with an extra digit on one hand, misaligned ocular features, and other irregularities typically linked to computer-generated art. The fact that these images are offered as rewards for game progress has left many feeling underwhelmed.
Additional screenshots from the online multiplayer campaign have also raised questions about the origin of certain graphics. It remains unclear which visuals were entirely handcrafted, which were the product of an automated process, and which represent a blend of both techniques where human intervention polished the initial machine output.
An official response from the publisher explains that they utilize a range of digital resources, including AI, to enhance the creative process. They emphasize that while these tools are employed to assist in the development, skilled professionals are still responsible for finalizing the content that appears in the game.
Key observations include:
- Visual elements that present unusual proportions and inconsistent features.
- Concerns regarding the overall quality of rewarded imagery.
- Uncertainty about the balance between machine-generated output and human refinement.
What are your thoughts on using automated imagery as gameplay rewards?